Evans v. Baker, 3:17-cv-00347-MMD-WGC. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190215c21
Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2019
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Pending before the court in this habeas corpus proceeding are three motions to extend time filed by the Respondents in relation to the filing and service of their answer. (ECF Nos. 28, 29, 30.) All three motions are supported by good cause. In addition, Respondents filed their answer on July 13, 2018, without apparent prejudice to the Petitioner. (ECF No. 31.) It is therefore ordered that Respondents' motions for extension of time (ECF Nos. 28, 29, 30
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Pending before the court in this habeas corpus proceeding are three motions to extend time filed by the Respondents in relation to the filing and service of their answer. (ECF Nos. 28, 29, 30.) All three motions are supported by good cause. In addition, Respondents filed their answer on July 13, 2018, without apparent prejudice to the Petitioner. (ECF No. 31.) It is therefore ordered that Respondents' motions for extension of time (ECF Nos. 28, 29, 30)..
More
ORDER
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
Pending before the court in this habeas corpus proceeding are three motions to extend time filed by the Respondents in relation to the filing and service of their answer. (ECF Nos. 28, 29, 30.) All three motions are supported by good cause. In addition, Respondents filed their answer on July 13, 2018, without apparent prejudice to the Petitioner. (ECF No. 31.)
It is therefore ordered that Respondents' motions for extension of time (ECF Nos. 28, 29, 30) are all granted nunc pro tunc as of their respective filing dates.
Source: Leagle
