Filed: Mar. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO GOVERNMENT'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AND/OR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (E.C.F. No. 3448) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . CERTIFICATION: This Stipulation is timely filed. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Nicholas A. Trutanich, United States Attorney, and Nancy Olson, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Mark D. Eibert, counsel for Defendant Gregory
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO GOVERNMENT'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AND/OR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (E.C.F. No. 3448) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . CERTIFICATION: This Stipulation is timely filed. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Nicholas A. Trutanich, United States Attorney, and Nancy Olson, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Mark D. Eibert, counsel for Defendant Gregory B..
More
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO GOVERNMENT'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AND/OR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (E.C.F. No. 3448)
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief District Judge.
CERTIFICATION: This Stipulation is timely filed.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Nicholas A. Trutanich, United States Attorney, and Nancy Olson, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Mark D. Eibert, counsel for Defendant Gregory Burleson, that the deadline for the government to respond to defendant's Motion For New Trial and/or Dismissal with Prejudice (ECF No. 3422) ("Motion") be extended to on or before May 31, 2019.
This stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:
1. The current due date gives the defense only seven days to Reply to a Response that the government had two months and four days to prepare, based on a stipulation by the parties that was granted by the Court.
2. Defense counsel, who is a sole practitioner, requests an extension of time to the requested date based on his other commitments to this and other courts and his need to confer with the defendant, who is incarcerated on the East Coast.
3. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but merely to allow the defense adequate time to prepare a Reply to the Response, taking into account due diligence.
4. This is the first request to continue the defendant's Reply deadline.
WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Court accept this Stipulation and enter an Order requiring the defense to file its Reply to the government's Response to the pending Motion for New Trial and/or Dismissal with Prejudice on or before May 31, 2019. For the convenience of the Court, a draft Order has been prepared and is attached to this Stipulation.
ORDER
This matter coming on the parties' Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Defendant's Reply to Government's Opposition to Motion for New Trial and/or Dismissal with Prejudice (E.C.F. No. 3448), the Court having considered the premises therein, and good cause showing, the Court accepts the parties' Stipulation.
It is ORDERED that the defendant will file its Reply to the government's Response (E.C.F. No. 3448) on or before May 31, 2019.
