Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Remark Holdings, Inc. v. China Branding Group Limited, 2:18-cv-00322-JAD-CWH. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190412a59 Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs Remark Holdings, Inc., and Kankan Limited, Defendant China Branding Group Limited (in Official Liquidation) acting through its Joint Official Liquidators, Hugh Dickson of Grant Thornton Specialist Services, and David Bennett of Grand Thornton Recovery and Reorganization Ltd. (the "Cayman Defendants"), and Defendant Adam Roseman hereby stipulate and agree that the
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs Remark Holdings, Inc., and Kankan Limited, Defendant China Branding Group Limited (in Official Liquidation) acting through its Joint Official Liquidators, Hugh Dickson of Grant Thornton Specialist Services, and David Bennett of Grand Thornton Recovery and Reorganization Ltd. (the "Cayman Defendants"), and Defendant Adam Roseman hereby stipulate and agree that the deadline to file an Amended Complaint should be extended from April 9, 2019, until April 19, 2019. In support of this stipulation, the parties state as follows:

1. On March 26, 2019, the Court issued a Decision and Order granting in part and denying in part Roseman's motion to dismiss the Complaint, and granting Plaintiffs leave to file an Amended Complaint on or before April 9, 2019 (ECF No. 66). On April 1, 2019, the Cayman Defendants filed an opposition to Plaintiffs' motion to enforce the Stipulation for Settlement, with a response currently due April 8, 2019. These filings came at a time when Plaintiffs' counsel was overseas, and Remark's principal is currently overseas.

2. The additional time is not sought for purposes of delay, but, instead, is necessary for Plaintiffs and undersigned counsel to adequately supplement their allegations as required by the Court's Order.

3. This is the parties' first request to extend the time for Plaintiffs to file an Amended Complaint.

DATED: April 9, 2019 /s/ Kyle J. Kolb /s/ John F. LaSalle Kyle C. Bisceglie (pro hac vice) Alan B. Vickery (pro hac vice) Kyle J. Kolb (pro hac vice) John F. LaSalle (pro hac vice) OLSHAN FROME WOLOSKY LLP BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 1325 Avenue of the Americas 575 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10019 New York, New York 10022 Crane M. Pomerantz (NV Bar No. 14103) Richard J. Pocker (NV Bar No. 3568) SKLAR WILLIAMS, PLLC BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 410 S. Rampart Blvd., Suite 350 300 South Fourth Street, Suite 800 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorneys for Plaintiffs REMARK Attorneys for Defendant ADAM ROSEMAN HOLDINGS, INC. and KANKAN LIMITED /s/ Robert D. Weber Robert D. Weber (pro hac vice) SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1600 Los Angeles, California 90067-6055 Robert J. Cassity (NV Bar No. 9779) HOLLAND & HART LLP 9555 Hillwood Dr., Second Floor Las Vegas, NV 89134 Attorneys for China Branding Group Limited (In Official Liquidation) and its Joint Official Liquidators Hugh Dickson and David Bennett

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer