STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

(Second Request)

PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff The American Automobile Association, Inc. ("AAA" or "Plaintiff") and Defendants AAA Anytime, Inc., Mitchell Winik and Katherine Carter ("Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 6(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("FED. R. Civ. P."), and Local Rule 6-1, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. Plaintiff commenced this action on February 12, 2019 by filing a Complaint against Defendants for trademark infringement in violation of Section 32 of the Federal Trademark Act (the "Lanham Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 1114; false designation of origin and unfair competition in violation of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); cybersquatting in violation of Section 43(d) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d); trademark

11. This Stipulation is submitted prior to the expiration of the period provided for the filing and service of Defendants' responses to the Complaint (April 5th), is not interposed merely for delay, and is made in good faith between the parties hereto.

12. This is the second stipulation to enlarge the time for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

The parties have not indicated how much time is requested. As such,

IT IS ORDERED that a 30-day extension, or until May 6, 2019, is granted for the defendant to file an answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. No further extensions will be allowed.