Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Richey v. Axon Enterprises, Inc., 3:19-cv-00192-MMD-CBC. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190717824 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff Douglas Richey ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant Axon Enterprise, Inc., formerly d/b/a TASER International, Inc. ("Axon") (referred to collectively herein as the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, respectfully submit this Stipulation to set a briefing schedule regarding Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 29). The
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

(FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff Douglas Richey ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant Axon Enterprise, Inc., formerly d/b/a TASER International, Inc. ("Axon") (referred to collectively herein as the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, respectfully submit this Stipulation to set a briefing schedule regarding Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 29). The Motion to Dismiss, which is the subject of this Stipulation, was filed on July 8, 2019. No hearing date has been set for this Motion. This Stipulation is made in accordance with LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1 of the Local Rules of this Court. This is the first request for an extension of time to respond to the Motion to Dismiss. The parties hereby stipulate as follows:

1. Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss on July 8, 2019.

2. Plaintiff's opposition to said motion is due to be filed on July 22, 2019.

3. Counsel for Plaintiff, James Terrell and Matthew Stephens, are set to begin a two-week trial commencing on July 15, 2019. Local counsel for Plaintiff, Charles A. Jones, is out of the office on a pre-paid family vacation from July 11 through July 22, 2019. As a result of these scheduling conflicts, counsel for Plaintiff will not be able to oppose the Motion to Dismiss on or before its current due date of July 22.

4. After meeting and conferring regarding the aforementioned scheduling conflicts the parties have agreed, and therefore stipulate, to a briefing schedule for the filing of the opposition and reply briefs as follows:

A. August 19, 2019: Deadline for Plaintiff to oppose the Motion to Dismiss; B. September 3, 2019: Deadline for Defendant to file its Reply brief. Dated this day of July 11, 2019 Dated this day of July 11, 2019 JONES LAW FIRM LLC LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP By: /s/ Charles A. Jones By: /s/Kristen Martini CHARLES A. JONES KRISTEN L. MARTINI State Bar No. 6698 State Bar No. 11272 KELLY McINERNEY ADRIENNE BRANTLEY-LOMELI State Bar No. 7443 State Bar No. 14486 9585 Prototype Court, Suite B One East Liberty Street, Suite 300 Reno, NV 89521 Reno, NV 89501 METHVIN TERRELL, YANCEY, In Association With: STEPHENS & MILLER, P.C. K. LEE MARSHALL, ESQ. (Pro Hac) BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP By: /s/ James Matthew Stephens Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor J. MATTHEW STEPHENS San Francisco, CA 94111 Pro Hac Vice JAMES M. TERRELL BARBARA A. SMITH, ESQ. (Pro Hac) Pro Hac Vice BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP 2201 Arlington Avenue South 211 N. Broadway, Suite 3600 Birmingham, AL 35205 St. Louis, MO 63102 PAMELA B. PETERSEN, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff State Bar No. 6451 AMY L. NGUYEN, ESQ. (Pro Hac) State Bar No. 023383 AXON ENTERPRISE, INC. 17800 N. 85th Street Scottsdale, AZ 85255 Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer