Filed: Oct. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . On October 11, 2019, the undersigned was assigned to this case. No later than November 1, 2019, the parties shall file a joint certification that they have: 1. discussed the potential for settling this matter, cf. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(2), 2. discussed the potential for utilizing alternative dispute resolution, including mediation or arbitration, cf. Local Rule 26-1(b)(7), and 3. discussed consenting to resolution of this case by a magistrate
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . On October 11, 2019, the undersigned was assigned to this case. No later than November 1, 2019, the parties shall file a joint certification that they have: 1. discussed the potential for settling this matter, cf. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(2), 2. discussed the potential for utilizing alternative dispute resolution, including mediation or arbitration, cf. Local Rule 26-1(b)(7), and 3. discussed consenting to resolution of this case by a magistrate ..
More
ORDER
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
On October 11, 2019, the undersigned was assigned to this case. No later than November 1, 2019, the parties shall file a joint certification that they have:
1. discussed the potential for settling this matter, cf. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(2),
2. discussed the potential for utilizing alternative dispute resolution, including mediation or arbitration, cf. Local Rule 26-1(b)(7), and
3. discussed consenting to resolution of this case by a magistrate judge, cf. Local Rule 26-1(b)(8).
The discussion must be conducted by attorneys of record (not staff) and the joint certification must specify the attorneys who participated in the discussion. The discussion must be telephonic, in-person, or by video, and the joint certification must specify the means of discussion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
