BROWN v. ELMHURST HOSPITAL CENTER, 11 CV 957. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. New York
Number: infdco20120118c57
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 13, 2012
Summary: ORDER RAYMOND J. DEARIE, District Judge. By letter dated December 20, 2011, defendant objects pursuant to Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to Magistrate Judge Bloom's order dated December 7, 2011, resolving a discovery dispute over the production of a sampling of underlying time sheets and records of plaintiffs co-workers. All of the grounds raised in defendant's letter regarding the burden that would be placed on defendant as compared to the necessity of the underlying records
Summary: ORDER RAYMOND J. DEARIE, District Judge. By letter dated December 20, 2011, defendant objects pursuant to Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to Magistrate Judge Bloom's order dated December 7, 2011, resolving a discovery dispute over the production of a sampling of underlying time sheets and records of plaintiffs co-workers. All of the grounds raised in defendant's letter regarding the burden that would be placed on defendant as compared to the necessity of the underlying records f..
More
ORDER
RAYMOND J. DEARIE, District Judge.
By letter dated December 20, 2011, defendant objects pursuant to Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to Magistrate Judge Bloom's order dated December 7, 2011, resolving a discovery dispute over the production of a sampling of underlying time sheets and records of plaintiffs co-workers. All of the grounds raised in defendant's letter regarding the burden that would be placed on defendant as compared to the necessity of the underlying records for pro se plaintiffs case were raised at the telephone conference before Magistrate Judge Bloom on December 6, 2011, and it is clear from the record that they were fully and fairly considered. The order is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Defendant's request to vacate the order is denied.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
