PELLOT v. COLVIN, 13cv1922. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20140902m51
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2014
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY, III, District Judge. Plaintiff pro se Mari Cruz Pellot ("Pellot") filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) seeking judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security's determination that her daughter, D.G., was ineligible for Supplemental Security Income and Disability Insurance Benefits. This Court referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Frank Maas. The Commissioner subsequently moved for a judgment on the pleadings, and Pellot did not oppose that motio
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY, III, District Judge. Plaintiff pro se Mari Cruz Pellot ("Pellot") filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) seeking judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security's determination that her daughter, D.G., was ineligible for Supplemental Security Income and Disability Insurance Benefits. This Court referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Frank Maas. The Commissioner subsequently moved for a judgment on the pleadings, and Pellot did not oppose that motion..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM H. PAULEY, III, District Judge.
Plaintiff pro se Mari Cruz Pellot ("Pellot") filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security's determination that her daughter, D.G., was ineligible for Supplemental Security Income and Disability Insurance Benefits. This Court referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Frank Maas. The Commissioner subsequently moved for a judgment on the pleadings, and Pellot did not oppose that motion. In a Report and Recommendation dated June 30, 2014 ("the Report"), Magistrate Judge Maas recommended that the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings be granted. As of this date, Pellot has neither submitted an objection to the Report nor requested an extension of time in which to do so. This Court finds that the Report is not facially erroneous, and affirms and adopts it. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted; the Commissioner's decision is hereby affirmed, and Pellott's Complaint is dismissed.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to mark this case closed.
Source: Leagle
