Filed: Jan. 31, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2020
Summary: ORDER SARAH NETBURN , Magistrate Judge . On October 31, 2019, plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendant Belcorso Jewelry Manufacturing Co., Inc. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), service was required within 90 days of the issuance of summons, or by January 29, 2020. Nothing on the docket reflects that service was made within this time. By February 4, 2020, the plaintiff shall submit a letter explaining whether he has served the defendant and, if not, the basis for failing to
Summary: ORDER SARAH NETBURN , Magistrate Judge . On October 31, 2019, plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendant Belcorso Jewelry Manufacturing Co., Inc. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), service was required within 90 days of the issuance of summons, or by January 29, 2020. Nothing on the docket reflects that service was made within this time. By February 4, 2020, the plaintiff shall submit a letter explaining whether he has served the defendant and, if not, the basis for failing to d..
More
ORDER
SARAH NETBURN, Magistrate Judge.
On October 31, 2019, plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendant Belcorso Jewelry Manufacturing Co., Inc. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), service was required within 90 days of the issuance of summons, or by January 29, 2020. Nothing on the docket reflects that service was made within this time.
By February 4, 2020, the plaintiff shall submit a letter explaining whether he has served the defendant and, if not, the basis for failing to do so within the time period required. If the plaintiff has failed to serve the defendant within the time required and cannot establish good cause for such failure, the Court may dismiss the case without prejudice. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56. 62 (2d Cir. 2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
SO ORDERED.
