Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jackson v. Stack, 16-CV-1041-A. (2019)

Court: District Court, W.D. New York Number: infdco20190320f01 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2019
Summary: DECISION AND ORDER RICHARD J. ARCARA , District Judge . This pro se prisoner's civil rights action was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). On November 20, 2018, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 38), recommending that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 16) be denied without prejudice and that defendant's motion to revoke plaintiff's in forma pauperis status (Dkt. No. 22) be denied as moot. Upon r
More

DECISION AND ORDER

This pro se prisoner's civil rights action was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On November 20, 2018, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 38), recommending that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 16) be denied without prejudice and that defendant's motion to revoke plaintiff's in forma pauperis status (Dkt. No. 22) be denied as moot.

Upon review of the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Scott's Report and Recommendation, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied and defendant's motion to revoke plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is denied as moot. The case remains referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott. Dkt. No. 9.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer