Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. AVILES-ORTIZ, 3:14-cr-36. (2014)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20140411a80 Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2014
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS MICHAEL R. MERZ, Magistrate Judge. This case came on for hearing on April 10, 2014. The Unites States was represented by Assistant United States Attorney Andrew Hunt and Defendant was represented by Assistant Federal Public Defender Art Mullins. Defendant orally consented to proceed before the United States Magistrate Judge for this proceeding. Defendant, through counsel, knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived indictment. The undersigned examined Defendan
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

MICHAEL R. MERZ, Magistrate Judge.

This case came on for hearing on April 10, 2014. The Unites States was represented by Assistant United States Attorney Andrew Hunt and Defendant was represented by Assistant Federal Public Defender Art Mullins. Defendant orally consented to proceed before the United States Magistrate Judge for this proceeding.

Defendant, through counsel, knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived indictment.

The undersigned examined Defendant under oath as to his understanding of the Plea Agreement and the effect of entering a plea pursuant to that Agreement. Having conducted the colloquy, the Magistrate Judge is persuaded the Defendant understands the rights waived by entering a guilty plea and is competent to do so. The Magistrate Judge also concludes that execution of the Plea Agreement, which was acknowledged in open court, is Defendant's voluntary, knowing, and intelligent act. It is therefore respectfully recommended that the Plea Agreement be accepted.

Defendant having executed the Plea Agreement, he tendered a plea of guilty to the offense charged in the Information. The Magistrate Judge concludes the guilty plea is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary and that the Statement of Facts made a part of the Plea Agreement, whose truth Defendant acknowledged, provides a sufficient factual basis for a finding of guilt. It is therefore respectfully recommended that the guilty plea be accepted and Defendant be found guilty as charged in the Information.

Anticipating the District Court's adoption of this Report and Recommendations, the Magistrate Judge referred the Defendant for a pre-sentence investigation, remanded him to the custody of the United States Marshal, and set sentencing before Judge Rice on July 8, 2014, at 10:00 A.M. in Courtroom No. 1.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer