Hairston v. Franklin County Sheriff's Office Center 1 Main Jail, 2:17-cv-581. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180703703
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2018
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. , Chief District Judge . On February 22, 2018 the Magistrate Judge issued an Order and Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 50) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff did not object. The time for filing an objection has passed, and no objection has been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 50.) Fo
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. , Chief District Judge . On February 22, 2018 the Magistrate Judge issued an Order and Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 50) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff did not object. The time for filing an objection has passed, and no objection has been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 50.) For..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., Chief District Judge.
On February 22, 2018 the Magistrate Judge issued an Order and Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 50) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff did not object. The time for filing an objection has passed, and no objection has been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 50.) For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (ECF No. 43.)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
