Crockett v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution, 2:16-cv-925. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180712c99
Filed: Jul. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2018
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH , District Judge . On June 8, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 be dismissed. (ECF No. 7.) Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 7) is ADO
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH , District Judge . On June 8, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 be dismissed. (ECF No. 7.) Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 7) is ADOP..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.
On June 8, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed. (ECF No. 7.) Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed.
The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 7) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.
Petitioner has waived his right to appeal by failing to file objections. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). The Court therefore DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
