Gallant v. Holdren, 1:16cv383. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20181009805
Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on February 15, 2018 Report and Recommendations (Doc. 61). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Do
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on February 15, 2018 Report and Recommendations (Doc. 61). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc..
More
ORDER
SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on February 15, 2018 Report and Recommendations (Doc. 61). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 64),
The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to amend/supplement the complaint (Doc. 50) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
