United States v. Clegg, 3:14-cr-122 (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20191114b58
Visitors: 16
Filed: Nov. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 81), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Supplemental Report and Recommendations. Accordingly
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 81), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Supplemental Report and Recommendations. Accordingly,..
More
ORDER ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 81), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Supplemental Report and Recommendations.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's § 2255 motion be dismissed with prejudice. Defendant is DENIED a certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
