Schmitz v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:17-cv-496. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20200131d27
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 30, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2020
Summary: ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Doc. 15) TIMOTHY S. BLACK , District Judge . This civil action is before the Court on the parties' Joint Stipulation for Entry of Judgment and Dismissal with Prejudice (the "Joint Stipulation"). (Doc. 15). In the Joint Stipulation, the parties ask the Court to "affirm the Commissioner's decision on remand and enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice." ( Id. at 1). The Court, having co
Summary: ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Doc. 15) TIMOTHY S. BLACK , District Judge . This civil action is before the Court on the parties' Joint Stipulation for Entry of Judgment and Dismissal with Prejudice (the "Joint Stipulation"). (Doc. 15). In the Joint Stipulation, the parties ask the Court to "affirm the Commissioner's decision on remand and enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice." ( Id. at 1). The Court, having con..
More
ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Doc. 15)
TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge.
This civil action is before the Court on the parties' Joint Stipulation for Entry of Judgment and Dismissal with Prejudice (the "Joint Stipulation"). (Doc. 15). In the Joint Stipulation, the parties ask the Court to "affirm the Commissioner's decision on remand and enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice." (Id. at 1). The Court, having considered the Joint Stipulation, the Commissioner's decision, and other relevant filings, concludes that the Joint Stipulation is well-taken. (See id.; Doc. 15-1). Accordingly:
1. The Joint Stipulation (Doc. 15) is GRANTED;
2. This civil action is DISMISSED with prejudice; and
3. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this civil action is TERMINATED from this Court's docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
