Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DAVIS v. COLVIN, CIV-14-294-L. (2015)

Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma Number: infdco20150618b15 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2015
Summary: ORDER TIM LEONARD , District Judge . On April 8, 2015, Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell entered a Report and Recommendation in this action brought by plaintiff Julie D. Davis pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for judicial review of the defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration's (Commissioner's) final decision denying plaintiff's application for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The Magistr
More

ORDER

On April 8, 2015, Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell entered a Report and Recommendation in this action brought by plaintiff Julie D. Davis pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for judicial review of the defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration's (Commissioner's) final decision denying plaintiff's application for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Commissioner's decision be affirmed.

The court file reflects that plaintiff timely filed her Objection to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate, which the court has carefully considered. Upon review of plaintiff's objections, the court finds that they are insufficient to justify overturning the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge properly found that the record provides substantial evidence to support the final decision of the Commissioner to deny plaintiff's application for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits. Plaintiff's arguments were correctly analyzed under proper legal standards and the findings in the Report and Recommendation are supported by the record. Thus, upon de novo review, the court finds that the the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner to deny plaintiff's application for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits is AFFIRMED.

It is so ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer