FRANKS v. HASSEL, 11-879. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120112a53
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2012
Summary: ORDER BERLE M. SCHILLER, District Judge. AND NOW, this 10 th day of January, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants Matthew Hassel and David Alston's Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendants Robert Hassel Jr. and Michael Acerenza's Motion for Summary Judgment, and Plaintiff's responses thereto, and for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum dated January 10, 2012, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants Matthew Hassel and David Alston's motion (Document No. 20) is GRANTED. 2
Summary: ORDER BERLE M. SCHILLER, District Judge. AND NOW, this 10 th day of January, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants Matthew Hassel and David Alston's Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendants Robert Hassel Jr. and Michael Acerenza's Motion for Summary Judgment, and Plaintiff's responses thereto, and for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum dated January 10, 2012, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants Matthew Hassel and David Alston's motion (Document No. 20) is GRANTED. 2...
More
ORDER
BERLE M. SCHILLER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 10th day of January, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants Matthew Hassel and David Alston's Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendants Robert Hassel Jr. and Michael Acerenza's Motion for Summary Judgment, and Plaintiff's responses thereto, and for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum dated January 10, 2012, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendants Matthew Hassel and David Alston's motion (Document No. 20) is GRANTED.
2. Defendants Robert Hassel Jr. and Michael Acerenza's motion (Document No. 19) is GRANTED.
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
Source: Leagle
