U.S. v. PANARELLA, 00-655. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120214c17
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2012
Summary: ORDER MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. AND NOW, this 13th day of February, 2012, upon consideration of Panarella's Motion for Expungement/Expunction or Other Appropriate Equitable Relief (Docket No. 65), and the response and reply thereto, for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today's date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said motion is DENIED.
ORDER
MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 13th day of February, 2012, upon consideration of Panarella's Motion for Expungement/Expunction or Other Appropriate Equitable Relief (Docket No. 65), and the response and reply thereto, for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today's date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said motion is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
