Filed: Jun. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2012
Summary: ORDER JAMES KNOLL GARDNER, District Judge. NOW, this 27 th day of June, 2012, upon consideration of the following documents: (1) Defendant Barley Snyder, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, which motion was filed on January 30, 2012 (Document 236); together with (A) Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant Barley Snyder, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56; (2) Defendant Barley Snyder, LLC's Statement of Indisputable Facts in Support of
Summary: ORDER JAMES KNOLL GARDNER, District Judge. NOW, this 27 th day of June, 2012, upon consideration of the following documents: (1) Defendant Barley Snyder, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, which motion was filed on January 30, 2012 (Document 236); together with (A) Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant Barley Snyder, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56; (2) Defendant Barley Snyder, LLC's Statement of Indisputable Facts in Support of ..
More
ORDER
JAMES KNOLL GARDNER, District Judge.
NOW, this 27th day of June, 2012, upon consideration of the following documents:
(1) Defendant Barley Snyder, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, which motion was filed on January 30, 2012 (Document 236); together with
(A) Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant Barley Snyder, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56;
(2) Defendant Barley Snyder, LLC's Statement of Indisputable Facts in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, which statement of indisputable facts was filed February 28, 2012 (Document 246);
(3) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, which memorandum of law was filed March 19, 2012 (Document 248);
(4) Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition to Defendant's Statement of Indisputable Facts in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment, which response was filed March 19, 2012 (Document 249); and
(5) Reply Memorandum in Support of Defendant Barley Snyder, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment, which reply memorandum was filed April 9, 2012 (Document 250).
upon consideration of the pleadings, record papers and exhibits, submitted by the parties, and for the reasons expressed in the accompanying Opinion,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Barley Snyder, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining portion of Count I of plaintiffs' Amended Complaint alleging a claim for breach of fiduciary duty on behalf of plaintiffs Michael Reis, Sr. and Lawrence J. Katz, individually, is dismissed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining portion of Count IV of the Amended Complaint brought by plaintiffs individually alleging tortious interference with contractual relations by defendant is dismissed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of defendant Barley, Snyder, Senft & Cohen, LLC. and against plaintiffs Michael Reis, Sr. and Lawrence J. Katz, individually.1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this matter closed for statistical purposes.
