Filed: Jul. 24, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2012
Summary: ORDER MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, Judge. AND NOW , this 23rd day of July, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant International Portfolio, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 18), Plaintiffs' response in opposition, their subsequent Motion to Withdraw Opposition in Part to Defendant International Portfolio, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss and Transfer the Remainder of the Case to Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas (Doc. No. 77), and the responses and replies thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the
Summary: ORDER MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, Judge. AND NOW , this 23rd day of July, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant International Portfolio, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 18), Plaintiffs' response in opposition, their subsequent Motion to Withdraw Opposition in Part to Defendant International Portfolio, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss and Transfer the Remainder of the Case to Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas (Doc. No. 77), and the responses and replies thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the ..
More
ORDER
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, Judge.
AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant International Portfolio, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 18), Plaintiffs' response in opposition, their subsequent Motion to Withdraw Opposition in Part to Defendant International Portfolio, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss and Transfer the Remainder of the Case to Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas (Doc. No. 77), and the responses and replies thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the Court's Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiffs' Motion (Doc. No. 77) is GRANTED in part as it relates to the withdrawal of their opposition to Defendant International Portfolio, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss, and DENIED in all other respects.
fendant International Portfolio, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 18) is GRANTED in part as it relates to Plaintiff Greenfish II, L.P.'s claims regarding Portfolios 1-4, as identified in Paragraph 57 of the Complaint, and DENIED in all other respects, consistent with the Court's Memorandum Opinion.
