MOONEY v. MOORE, 11-CV-193. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140909a21
Visitors: 17
Filed: Sep. 08, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 08, 2014
Summary: ORDER BERLE M. SCHILLER, District Judge. AND NOW, this 8 day of September, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DISMISSED with prejudice.
Summary: ORDER BERLE M. SCHILLER, District Judge. AND NOW, this 8 day of September, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3..
More
ORDER
BERLE M. SCHILLER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 8 day of September, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED with prejudice.
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
Source: Leagle
