CARTER v. BICKELL, 13-CV-7293. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150102997
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 29, 2014
Summary: ORDER EDMUND V. LUDWIG, District Judge. AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. no. 1), the petition for stay and abeyance (doc. no. 2), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley (doc. no. 19), and petitioners objections thereto (doc. no. 21), it is ordered that: 1. Petitioner's objections are overruled. 2. The Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted.
Summary: ORDER EDMUND V. LUDWIG, District Judge. AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. no. 1), the petition for stay and abeyance (doc. no. 2), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley (doc. no. 19), and petitioners objections thereto (doc. no. 21), it is ordered that: 1. Petitioner's objections are overruled. 2. The Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted. 3..
More
ORDER
EDMUND V. LUDWIG, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. no. 1), the petition for stay and abeyance (doc. no. 2), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley (doc. no. 19), and petitioners objections thereto (doc. no. 21), it is ordered that:
1. Petitioner's objections are overruled.
2. The Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted.
3. The petition for stay and abeyance and the petition for writ of habeas corpus are denied.
4. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
Source: Leagle
