Clientron Corp. v. Devon IT, Inc., 13-05634. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160330b79
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 23, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2016
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL M. BAYLSON , District Judge . AND NOW this 23rd day of March, 2016, for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court rules on Clientron's Motions in Limine as follows: 1. MIL #1 — GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 2. MIL #2 — DENIED without prejudice. 3. MIL #3 and MIL # 7 — Held under advisement pending an offer of proof. 4. MIL #4 — The Court will rule after argument is presented on the parties' positions as to foreign law, pursuant to Ru
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL M. BAYLSON , District Judge . AND NOW this 23rd day of March, 2016, for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court rules on Clientron's Motions in Limine as follows: 1. MIL #1 — GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 2. MIL #2 — DENIED without prejudice. 3. MIL #3 and MIL # 7 — Held under advisement pending an offer of proof. 4. MIL #4 — The Court will rule after argument is presented on the parties' positions as to foreign law, pursuant to Rul..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, District Judge.
AND NOW this 23rd day of March, 2016, for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court rules on Clientron's Motions in Limine as follows:
1. MIL #1 — GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
2. MIL #2 — DENIED without prejudice.
3. MIL #3 and MIL # 7 — Held under advisement pending an offer of proof.
4. MIL #4 — The Court will rule after argument is presented on the parties' positions as to foreign law, pursuant to Rule 44.1 within seven (7) days.
5. MIL #5 — DENIED without prejudice.
6. MIL #6 and MIL #8 — DENIED without prejudice.
7. MIL #9 — DENIED.
8. MIL #10 — DENIED.
9. MIL #11 and MIL #12 — Held under advisement pending further filings or until trial.
Source: Leagle
