HUNSINGER v. CARR, 14-2302. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160526d65
Visitors: 4
Filed: May 24, 2016
Latest Update: May 24, 2016
Summary: ORDER ROBERT F. KELLY , Senior District Judge . AND NOW , this 24th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of the arguments made during the hearing conducted on April 29, 2016, regarding the issue of whether the FIRNA Arbitration Panel had jurisdiction, and all of the relevant facts taken from other court documents and proceedings conducted in this action, it is it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. the FINRA Arbitration Panel did have jurisdiction; and 2. Plaintiff, Norman Hunsinger's Complaint
Summary: ORDER ROBERT F. KELLY , Senior District Judge . AND NOW , this 24th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of the arguments made during the hearing conducted on April 29, 2016, regarding the issue of whether the FIRNA Arbitration Panel had jurisdiction, and all of the relevant facts taken from other court documents and proceedings conducted in this action, it is it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. the FINRA Arbitration Panel did have jurisdiction; and 2. Plaintiff, Norman Hunsinger's Complaint ..
More
ORDER
ROBERT F. KELLY, Senior District Judge.
AND NOW, this 24th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of the arguments made during the hearing conducted on April 29, 2016, regarding the issue of whether the FIRNA Arbitration Panel had jurisdiction, and all of the relevant facts taken from other court documents and proceedings conducted in this action, it is it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. the FINRA Arbitration Panel did have jurisdiction; and
2. Plaintiff, Norman Hunsinger's Complaint to Confirm FINRA Arbitration Award (Doc. 1) is GRANTED because there is no basis upon which to vacate, modify, or correct the FINRA Arbitration Award.
Source: Leagle
