Filed: May 15, 2018
Latest Update: May 15, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. , District Judge . AND NOW , this 15 th day of May, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 4, and for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this date, it is ORDERED that Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 4, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. The Motion is GRANTED to the extent that paragraphs 23 and 25 of the Complaint allege violations of the FCRA based on Defendant's conduct prio
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. , District Judge . AND NOW , this 15 th day of May, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 4, and for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this date, it is ORDERED that Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 4, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. The Motion is GRANTED to the extent that paragraphs 23 and 25 of the Complaint allege violations of the FCRA based on Defendant's conduct prior..
More
ORDER
JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR., District Judge.
AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 4, and for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this date, it is ORDERED that Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 4, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
1. The Motion is GRANTED to the extent that paragraphs 23 and 25 of the Complaint allege violations of the FCRA based on Defendant's conduct prior to Coulter's dispute;
2. The Motion is DENIED to the extent that paragraphs 23, 25, and 28 of the Complaint allege that Defendant failed to fulfill its responsibility to provide a complete and accurate post-dispute reporting of debts.
