Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sodexomagic, LLC v. Drexel University, 16-5144. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20180803b87 Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTIONS TO STRIKE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON , District Judge . AND NOW , this second day of August, 2018, after review of the parties' motions, the submissions related thereto, and oral argument, and as discussed further in the Court's accompanying Memorandum, which details the specific portions of the parties' claims that remain in dispute, the Court rules as follows: 1. Drexel's Motion to Strike (ECF 208) will be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART,
More

ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTIONS TO STRIKE

AND NOW, this second day of August, 2018, after review of the parties' motions, the submissions related thereto, and oral argument, and as discussed further in the Court's accompanying Memorandum, which details the specific portions of the parties' claims that remain in dispute, the Court rules as follows:

1. Drexel's Motion to Strike (ECF 208) will be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, 2. Sodexo's Motion to Strike (ECF 221) will be DENIED, 3. Drexel's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 220) will be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, and 4. Sodexo's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 200, 204) will be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

As a result, Counts I, II, III, and IV of Sodexo's Complaint will be DISMISSED, Count V of Sodexo's Supplemental Complaint will be DISMISSED IN PART, Count I of Drexel's Counterclaims will be DISMISSED, and Count II of Drexel's Counterclaims will be DISMISSED IN PART.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer