Harrell v. Smith, 17-2813. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180822e48
Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY , District Judge . AND NOW , this 20th day of August 2018, upon consideration of the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), the Response to the Petition (Doc. No. 16), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa (Doc. No. 17), and that the Report and Recommendation has not been objected to by the parties, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 17) is APPROVED and ADOPTED . 2. The Petitio
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY , District Judge . AND NOW , this 20th day of August 2018, upon consideration of the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), the Response to the Petition (Doc. No. 16), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa (Doc. No. 17), and that the Report and Recommendation has not been objected to by the parties, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 17) is APPROVED and ADOPTED . 2. The Petition..
More
ORDER
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 20th day of August 2018, upon consideration of the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), the Response to the Petition (Doc. No. 16), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa (Doc. No. 17), and that the Report and Recommendation has not been objected to by the parties, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 17) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED.
3. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT issue because, based on the analysis contained in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, as approved and adopted by this Court, a reasonable jurist could not conclude that the Court is incorrect in denying and dismissing the Habeas Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000).
4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.
Source: Leagle
