Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Vidra v. Hertz Corporation, 18-2939. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20181009d39 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER WENDY BEETLESTONE , District Judge . AND NOW , this 4th day of October, 2018, upon consideration of the Hertz Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 5, 11) and Plaintiff's opposition thereto (ECF Nos. 8, 13), IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED . Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE against the Hertz Defendants. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon consideration of the Bosch Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 9, 17) and Plaintiff's opposition thereto (ECF N
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 4th day of October, 2018, upon consideration of the Hertz Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 5, 11) and Plaintiff's opposition thereto (ECF Nos. 8, 13), IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE against the Hertz Defendants.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon consideration of the Bosch Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 9, 17) and Plaintiff's opposition thereto (ECF No. 16), IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE against the Bosch Defendants.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon consideration Plaintiff's Motion to Strike (ECF No. 16) and the Bosch Defendants' Response thereto (ECF No. 17), IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer