Chambers v. Ebbert, 3:18-cv-01009. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190107c65
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. SAPORITO, JR. , Magistrate Judge . AND NOW, this 21 st day of December, 2018, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The plaintiff's pro se "Motion to Object to Magistrate Judge Saporito Order Doc # 42," (Doc. 46) is DENIED to the extent it may be liberally construed as motion for reconsideration; 2. The plaintiff's pro se "Motion to Object to Magistrate Judge Saporito Order Doc # 42," (Doc. 46) is DENIED to the extent i
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. SAPORITO, JR. , Magistrate Judge . AND NOW, this 21 st day of December, 2018, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The plaintiff's pro se "Motion to Object to Magistrate Judge Saporito Order Doc # 42," (Doc. 46) is DENIED to the extent it may be liberally construed as motion for reconsideration; 2. The plaintiff's pro se "Motion to Object to Magistrate Judge Saporito Order Doc # 42," (Doc. 46) is DENIED to the extent it..
More
ORDER
JOSEPH F. SAPORITO, JR., Magistrate Judge.
AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2018, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The plaintiff's pro se "Motion to Object to Magistrate Judge Saporito Order Doc # 42," (Doc. 46) is DENIED to the extent it may be liberally construed as motion for reconsideration;
2. The plaintiff's pro se "Motion to Object to Magistrate Judge Saporito Order Doc # 42," (Doc. 46) is DENIED to the extent it may be liberally construed as a motion for recusal; and
3. The Clerk is directed to re-docket the plaintiff's pro se "Motion to Object to Magistrate Judge Saporito Order Doc # 42," (Doc. 46) also as an Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court with respect to our Order denying the plaintiff's pro se motion for entry of default (Doc. 42).
Source: Leagle
