Hamilton v. Moore, (1797)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number:
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 15, 1797
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: 3 U.S. 371 (_) 3 Dall. 371 HAMILTON versus MOORE. Supreme Court of United States. *374 Ingersoll and Dallas, for the Defendant in error. *377 But, THE COURT observed, that there was no error in point of fact; nor any clerical error to amend. The writ bears the date when it was actually sued out and lodged in the office: there is, therefore, nothing on the record, by which it can be amended; and the objection is fatal. The Writ of Error was, therefore, non-prossed.
3 U.S. 371 (____)
3 Dall. 371
HAMILTON
versus
MOORE.
Supreme Court of United States.
Ingersoll and Dallas, for the Defendant in error.
But, THE COURT observed, that there was no error in point of fact; nor any clerical error to amend. The writ bears the date when it was actually sued out and lodged in the office: there is, therefore, nothing on the record, by which it can be amended; and the objection is fatal.
The Writ of Error was, therefore, non-prossed.
Source: CourtListener
