Filed: Feb. 14, 1798
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: 3 U.S. 382 (_) 3 Dall. 382 BINGHAM, Plaintiff in Error, versus CABOT, et al. Supreme Court of United States. *383 Lee, Attorney General, contended for the Plaintiff in error. THE COURT were clearly of opinion, that it was necessary to set forth the citizenship (or alienage, where a foreigner was concerned) of the respective parties, in order to bring the *384 case within the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court; and that the record, in the present case, was in that respect defective. This cause and
Summary: 3 U.S. 382 (_) 3 Dall. 382 BINGHAM, Plaintiff in Error, versus CABOT, et al. Supreme Court of United States. *383 Lee, Attorney General, contended for the Plaintiff in error. THE COURT were clearly of opinion, that it was necessary to set forth the citizenship (or alienage, where a foreigner was concerned) of the respective parties, in order to bring the *384 case within the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court; and that the record, in the present case, was in that respect defective. This cause and ..
More
3 U.S. 382 (____)
3 Dall. 382
BINGHAM, Plaintiff in Error,
versus
CABOT, et al.
Supreme Court of United States.
Lee, Attorney General, contended for the Plaintiff in error.
THE COURT were clearly of opinion, that it was necessary to set forth the citizenship (or alienage, where a foreigner was concerned) of the respective parties, in order to bring the case within the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court; and that the record, in the present case, was in that respect defective.
This cause and many others, in the same predicament, were, accordingly, struck off the docket.
