Sublett v. Adams, 406 M (1960)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 406 M
Visitors: 6
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Mar. 07, 1960
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 362 U.S. 143 (1960) SUBLETT v. ADAMS, WARDEN. No. 406, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided March 7, 1960. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA. Petitioner pro se. W. W. Barron, Attorney General of West Virginia, and Fred H. Caplan, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the
Summary: 362 U.S. 143 (1960) SUBLETT v. ADAMS, WARDEN. No. 406, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided March 7, 1960. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA. Petitioner pro se. W. W. Barron, Attorney General of West Virginia, and Fred H. Caplan, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the ..
More
362 U.S. 143 (1960)
SUBLETT
v.
ADAMS, WARDEN.
No. 406, Misc.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided March 7, 1960.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA.
Petitioner pro se.
W. W. Barron, Attorney General of West Virginia, and Fred H. Caplan, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Petitioner charged that he was being held in prison without lawful authority and in violation of due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment. The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals refused the writ without either a hearing or a response from the State.
We hold that the facts alleged are such as to entitle petitioner to a hearing under Herman v. Claudy, 350 U.S. 116. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Source: CourtListener
