Nexpay Inc v. Comdata Network Inc, 3:14-cv-1749. (2017)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20171221f89
Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2017
Summary: ORDER ALETA A. TRAUGER , District Judge . On October 6, 2017, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE #138), objections to which have been withdrawn (Docket No. 154). The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that Comdata's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Counterclaim Without Prejudice (Docket No. 119) is GRANTED, with the understanding tha
Summary: ORDER ALETA A. TRAUGER , District Judge . On October 6, 2017, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE #138), objections to which have been withdrawn (Docket No. 154). The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that Comdata's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Counterclaim Without Prejudice (Docket No. 119) is GRANTED, with the understanding that..
More
ORDER
ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge.
On October 6, 2017, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE #138), objections to which have been withdrawn (Docket No. 154). The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that Comdata's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Counterclaim Without Prejudice (Docket No. 119) is GRANTED, with the understanding that the parties have represented to the court that Comdata has satisfied whatever fees and costs were required to be paid pursuant to the Report and Recommendation.
The Clerk shall term the Motion for De Novo Review of Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 139), as it has been withdrawn (Docket No. 154).
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
