Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MARADIAGA v. INTERMODAL BRIDGE TRANSPORT, INC., 3:10-CV-1028-L. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. Texas Number: infdco20130905e90 Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 04, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 04, 2013
Summary: ORDER SAM A. LINDSAY, District Judge. Before the court is Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney's Fees (Doc. 141), filed January 22, 2013, which was referred to Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney, who entered Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge ("Report") on August 20, 2013, recommending that the motion be denied. Plaintiffs filed objections to the Report on September 3, 2013, contending that they are prevailing parties because they prevailed on their objec
More

ORDER

SAM A. LINDSAY, District Judge.

Before the court is Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney's Fees (Doc. 141), filed January 22, 2013, which was referred to Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney, who entered Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge ("Report") on August 20, 2013, recommending that the motion be denied. Plaintiffs filed objections to the Report on September 3, 2013, contending that they are prevailing parties because they prevailed on their objective of filing suit to obtain documents from Defendant to verify their pay. Having carefully reviewed the pleadings, file, record in this case, Plaintiffs' objections, applicable law, and the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge, the court determines that the findings and conclusions that Plaintiffs are not prevailing parties are correct. The court therefore accepts them as those of the court, overrules Plaintiffs' objections, and denies Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney's Fees.

It is so ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer