Roberts v. Davis, 7:19-cv-031-O-BP. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
Number: infdco20191024e05
Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE REED O'CONNOR , District Judge . This is a habeas action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 in which Petitioner challenges his Wilbarger County convictions for the offenses of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, evading arrest with a vehicle, and unlawful possession of a firearm. The United States Magistrate Judge entered his Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation in which he recommend
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE REED O'CONNOR , District Judge . This is a habeas action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 in which Petitioner challenges his Wilbarger County convictions for the offenses of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, evading arrest with a vehicle, and unlawful possession of a firearm. The United States Magistrate Judge entered his Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation in which he recommends..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
REED O'CONNOR, District Judge.
This is a habeas action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which Petitioner challenges his Wilbarger County convictions for the offenses of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, evading arrest with a vehicle, and unlawful possession of a firearm. The United States Magistrate Judge entered his Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation in which he recommends that the petition be dismissed as time-barred. See ECF No. 26. Objections were filed by Petitioner. ECF No. 29. The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to which objections were made and reviewed the remaining Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, I am of the opinion that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and reasons for dismissal set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation are correct and they are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as the Findings of the Court.
For the foregoing reasons, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice as TIME-BARRED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
