In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                         No. 17-0424V
                                      Filed: May 7, 2018
                                        UNPUBLISHED


    KRYSTAL ALCOTT,
                                                             Special Processing Unit (SPU);
                        Petitioner,                          Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
    v.

    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,

                       Respondent.


Anne Carrion Toale, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner.
Sarah Christina Duncan, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.


                      DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

        On March 24, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a right shoulder injury as a result of
a hepatitis B vaccination administered on June 17, 2016. Petition at 1, 3. On
December 20, 2017, the undersigned issued a decision awarding compensation to
petitioner based on the respondent’s proffer. (ECF No. 32).




1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2
 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
       On March 5, 2018, petitioner filed an unopposed motion for attorneys’ fees and
costs. (ECF No. 36). 3 Petitioner requested attorneys’ fees in the amount of $12,602.00
and attorneys’ costs in the amount of $839.95. (Id. at 1.) In compliance with General
Order #9, petitioner filed a signed statement indicating that petitioner incurred no out-of-
pocket expenses. (Id. at 1). Thus, the total amount requested is $13,441.95.

        A decision was originally issued on March 23, 2018. (ECF No. 41). Petitioner
filed a motion for reconsideration of attorney’s fees and costs on April 12, 2018. (ECF
No. 42). The undersigned withdrew the original decision on April 17, 2018, 4 and ordered
respondent to file his response, if any, by April 30, 2018. (ECF No. 40.) Respondent
did not file a response.

       In petitioner’s motion, she requests a rate of $402 per hour for time accrued in
2018 by Anne Carrion Toale. Petitioner’s motion is persuasive given the facts and
circumstances of this case, and the reasons set forth in petitioner’s Motion for
Reconsideration. In particular, due to petitioner’s counsel’s experience in the vaccine
program, overall legal experience, quality of work, and reputation of in the legal
community and the community at large, the undersigned finds the rate of $402 per hour
for time accrued by Anne Carrion Toale in 2018 reasonable. The hourly rate for
attorney Amber Wilson remains at the previously awarded rate of $290 per hour for
work performed in 2017, reducing the request for fees by $1.80.

      Accordingly, the undersigned awards the total of $13,440.15 5 as a lump
sum in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel
Anne Carrion Toale. Petitioner request payment be forwarded to Maglio
Christopher & Toale, PA, 1605 Main Street, Suite 710, Sarasota Florida 34236.




3 The motion was filed as an unopposed motion and specifically states that respondent has no objection
to petitioner’s request. (ECF No. 36 at 1).

4 Although not specifically stated the undersigned’s April 17, 2018 order granted petitioner’s motion for
reconsideration based upon the applicable legal standard, “in the interest of justice”. See Shaw v.
Secretary of Health and Human Services, 

, 720 (Fed.Cl.2010); Krakow v. Sec’y of Health
and Human Services, No. 03-0632V 

, at *5 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Nov 12, 2010).

5This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all
charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered.
Furthermore, § 15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would
be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.,

(Fed. Cir.1991).

                                                    2
        The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith. 6


IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                           s/Nora Beth Dorsey
                                                           Nora Beth Dorsey
                                                           Chief Special Master




6 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.

                                                      3