Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

OLLAND v. MILLER, 7:13cv00057. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Virginia Number: infdco20140512b20 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2014
Summary: ORDER SAMUEL G. WILSON, District Judge. In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this day it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1) The motion of defendant Dr. D Miller to dismiss is GRANTED as to all federal claims against him, except Holland's deliberate indifference claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 and it is DENIED as to that claim without prejudice to reconsideration on motion for summary judgment; 2) The motions of defendants Eugene Whited, M. Phillips, P. Goins, M.
More

ORDER

SAMUEL G. WILSON, District Judge.

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this day it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

1) The motion of defendant Dr. D Miller to dismiss is GRANTED as to all federal claims against him, except Holland's deliberate indifference claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and it is DENIED as to that claim without prejudice to reconsideration on motion for summary judgment; 2) The motions of defendants Eugene Whited, M. Phillips, P. Goins, M. Coleman, and C. Hawks to dismiss the federal claims against them are GRANTED; 3) Holland's claims against defendants Correctional Officer Horne and Gail Jones are DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); 4) The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Holland's state law claims because they would predominate over the single remaining claim, and they are DISMISSED without prejudice; and 5) All other outstanding motions are DENIED as moot.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer