DONOHUE v. LAMBERT, 7:13CV00397. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Virginia
Number: infdco20151228864
Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER GLEN E. CONRAD , Chief District Judge . In accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that after de novo review of the evidence and a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which plaintiff has made specific objection, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), plaintiff's objections (ECF No. 377) are OVERRULED, and the report and recommendation (ECF No. 365) is ADOPTED in
Summary: ORDER GLEN E. CONRAD , Chief District Judge . In accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that after de novo review of the evidence and a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which plaintiff has made specific objection, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), plaintiff's objections (ECF No. 377) are OVERRULED, and the report and recommendation (ECF No. 365) is ADOPTED in i..
More
ORDER
GLEN E. CONRAD, Chief District Judge.
In accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby
ADJUDGED AND ORDERED
that after de novo review of the evidence and a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which plaintiff has made specific objection, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), plaintiff's objections (ECF No. 377) are OVERRULED, and the report and recommendation (ECF No. 365) is ADOPTED in its entirety; the motions for summary judgment filed by Defendants Swiney and Rose (ECF Nos. 284 and 311) are GRANTED; and the clerk WILL terminate these individuals as parties to the lawsuit.
Source: Leagle
