U.S. v. EMERSON, CrR14-5304 BHS. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20150203869
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 28, 2015
Summary: ORDER BENJAMIN H. SETTLE, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on in camera review documents the Government has submitted to the Court. On January 27, 2015, the Government submitted a binder of documents to the Court regarding a confidential informant. The binder was separated into six categories of documents. The Court has reviewed the documents and orders the Government to produce the documents in category 1, 2, 4 & 6. Reasons for the disclosure and nondisclosure will be ent
Summary: ORDER BENJAMIN H. SETTLE, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on in camera review documents the Government has submitted to the Court. On January 27, 2015, the Government submitted a binder of documents to the Court regarding a confidential informant. The binder was separated into six categories of documents. The Court has reviewed the documents and orders the Government to produce the documents in category 1, 2, 4 & 6. Reasons for the disclosure and nondisclosure will be ente..
More
ORDER
BENJAMIN H. SETTLE, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on in camera review documents the Government has submitted to the Court.
On January 27, 2015, the Government submitted a binder of documents to the Court regarding a confidential informant. The binder was separated into six categories of documents. The Court has reviewed the documents and orders the Government to produce the documents in category 1, 2, 4 & 6. Reasons for the disclosure and nondisclosure will be entered into the record at the scheduled hearing this Friday, January 30, 2015.
The Government shall redact portions of these documents that it deems necessary and provide such redaction versions to the Court and Emerson no later than 3:00PM, Thursday, January 29, 2015. The Government shall also be prepared to explain the reasons in general terms for its redactions if the Court so inquires at the hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
