Filed: Jan. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2020
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . Respondent Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") and Petitioner United States of America ("United States"), through their respective undersigned counsel of record, and pursuant to Local Rules 7(d)(1) and 10(g), respectfully stipulate and seek an order from the Court as follows: 1. On January 17, 2020, the Court issued an Order (Dkt. No. 187) ruling on certain documents submitted by Microsoft for in camera review (the "Janua
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . Respondent Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") and Petitioner United States of America ("United States"), through their respective undersigned counsel of record, and pursuant to Local Rules 7(d)(1) and 10(g), respectfully stipulate and seek an order from the Court as follows: 1. On January 17, 2020, the Court issued an Order (Dkt. No. 187) ruling on certain documents submitted by Microsoft for in camera review (the "Januar..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, Chief District Judge.
Respondent Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") and Petitioner United States of America ("United States"), through their respective undersigned counsel of record, and pursuant to Local Rules 7(d)(1) and 10(g), respectfully stipulate and seek an order from the Court as follows:
1. On January 17, 2020, the Court issued an Order (Dkt. No. 187) ruling on certain documents submitted by Microsoft for in camera review (the "January 17, 2020 Order").
2. The January 17, 2020 Order directs Microsoft to "provide the documents still in dispute in accordance with the Court's Order within seven (7) days[,]" which date is January 24, 2020 (the "Production Date").
3. To allow Microsoft time to evaluate its procedural options, Microsoft and the United States respectfully request that the Production Date in the January 17, 2020 Order be changed to February 7, 2020 — an additional 14 days — for Microsoft to comply with the Order or file a motion for stay pending appeal.
4. Should Microsoft file a motion for stay pending appeal, then Microsoft will, pursuant to Local Rule 7(d)(3), note its motion for consideration on (but not before) February 21, 2020, or as soon thereafter as permitted by the Local Rules and the Court.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: January 23, 2020
CALFO EAKES & OSTROVSKY LLP
By: Andrea Delgadillo Ostrovsky, WSBA #37749
Patty A. Eakes, WSBA #18888
1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2800
Seattle, WA 98101
Tel: (206) 407-2211
Fax: (206) 407-2224
Email: pattye@calfoeakes.com
Email: andreao@calfoeakes.com
BAKER & McKENZIE LLP
By: Daniel A. Rosen, NYBA #2790442
Pro Hac Vice
452 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Phone: (212) 626-4272
Phone: (212) 626-4272
Email: daniel.rosen@bakermckenzie.com
Attorneys for Respondent Microsoft Corporation
RICHARD E. ZUCKERMAN
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
NOREENE STEHLIK
JAMES E. WEAVER
Senior Litigation Counsel, Tax Division
JEREMY HENDON
AMY MATCHISON
Trial Attorneys, Tax Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 683, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20044-0683
Email: Noreene.C.Stehlik@usdoj.gov
James.E.Weaver@usdoj.gov
Jeremy.Hendon@usdoj.gov
Amy.T.Matchison@usdoj.gov
Western.TaxCivil@usdoj.gov
Telephone: (202) 514-6489
(202) 353-2466
(202) 307-6422
BRIAN T. MORAN
United States Attorney
Western District of Washington
Attorneys for the United States of America
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
