Probably not. It depends upon whether the person is a public figure. And, yes, it matters that the picture is from a magazine ad--even worse. That would belong to the magazine or the photographer (depending upon their agreement), and might constitute copyright or trademark infringement as well as depicting the person without consent. Chances are the person in the magazine gave consent for that particular use, but not for any other. Usually, the photos you see in films are of actors who have been paid.

Probably not. It depends upon whether the person is a public figure. And, yes, it matters that the picture is from a magazine ad--even worse. That would belong to the magazine or the photographer (depending upon their agreement), and might constitute copyright or trademark infringement as well as depicting the person without consent. Chances are the person in the magazine gave consent for that particular use, but not for any other. Usually, the photos you see in films are of actors who have been paid.

Probably not. It depends upon whether the person is a public figure. And, yes, it matters that the picture is from a magazine ad--even worse. That would belong to the magazine or the photographer (depending upon their agreement), and might constitute copyright or trademark infringement as well as depicting the person without consent. Chances are the person in the magazine gave consent for that particular use, but not for any other. Usually, the photos you see in films are of actors who have been paid.