Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
IN RE SHANER, 142 A.3d 1051 (2016)
Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania Filed:PA Aug. 16, 2016 Citations: 142 A.3d 1051, 10 JD 15.

OPINION OPINION BY PRESIDENT JUDGE COLVILLE . FACTUAL BACKGROUND Facing four counts of allegations concerning his conduct, Respondent Dwight Shaner, a retired senior magisterial district judge (Former Judge Shaner) has entered factual stipulations (See C.J.D.R.P. No. 502(d)) with the Judicial Conduct Board (Board) as follows: 1. The parties stipulate to the authenticity and admissibility of all exhibits set forth at Paragraphs B (1)-(7). 1 2. This action Is taken by the Board...

# 1
IN RE CARNEY, 28 A.3d 253 (2011)
Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania Filed:PA Jun. 08, 2011 Citations: 28 A.3d 253, 2 JD 10.

OPINION BY Judge CURRAN. I. INTRODUCTORY SUMMARY The Judicial Conduct Board ("the Board") has filed a Complaint with this Court against Magisterial District Judge Thomas Carney ("Respondent"). The Complaint consists of seven Counts (actually six Counts because Count 1 and Count 7 are the same). 1 The conduct of Respondent which the Board has charged as violating various standards of judicial conduct includes: — making public comments about cases pending or impending in his office or in...

# 2
IN RE TOOLE, 26 A.3d 581 (2011)
Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania Filed:PA Jul. 26, 2011 Citations: 26 A.3d 581, 5 JD 11

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 24th day of June 2011, based upon the Conclusions of Law, it is hereby ORDERED: That, pursuant to C.J.D.R.P. No. 503, the attached Opinion with Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law be and it is hereby filed, and shah be served on the Judicial Conduct Board and upon the Respondent, That, either party may file written objections to the Court's Conclusions of Law within ten (10) days of this Order. Said objections shah include the basis therefor and shall be...

# 3

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer