Flagler FL Lawyers | Albert J Hadeed -- eLawyers

Albert J Hadeed

Visitors: 72

Bar #180906(FL) License for 51 years; Member in Good Standing

Bunnell FL

Are you Albert J Hadeed? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Florida Administrative Code: 63G-1.012, 63G-1.013, 63G-1.014, 63G-1.015, 63G-1.016, 63G-1.017

51226 The Florida Bar v. Furman (1979)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Nov. 01, 1979 Citations: 376 So. 2d 378

376 So. 2d 378 (1979) THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner, v. Rosemary W. FURMAN, Etc., Respondent. No. 51226. Supreme Court of Florida. May 10, 1979. On Rehearing and Opinion Clarified November 1, 1979. Bernard H. Dempsey, Jr., Chairman, Standing Committee on Unauthorized Practice of Law, Orlando, Lacy Mahon, Jr., Bar Counsel, Jacksonville, and H. Glenn Boggs, II and John A. Weiss, Asst. Staff Counsels, Tallahassee, for petitioner. *379 Albert J. Hadeed, Southern Legal Counsel, Inc., Gainesville, and Al..

63564 CIT. GROWTH MGT. COALITION v. City of West Palm Beach, Inc. (1984)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Mar. 08, 1984 Citations: 450 So. 2d 204

450 So. 2d 204 (1984) CITIZENS GROWTH MANAGEMENT COALITION OF WEST PALM BEACH, INC., Appellant. v. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, INC., et al., Appellees. No. 63564. Supreme Court of Florida. March 8, 1984. Rehearing Denied June 14, 1984. *205 Albert J. Hadeed, John K. McPherson and William P. Healy of Southern Legal Counsel, Inc., Gainesville, for appellant. Carl V.M. Coffin, City Atty., West Palm Beach, for City of West Palm Beach. L. Louis Mrachek and David M. Layman of Gunster, Yoakley, Criser & St..

53305 The Florida Bar v. Moses (1980)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jan. 17, 1980 Citations: 380 So. 2d 412

380 So. 2d 412 (1980) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Edward P. MOSES, Respondent. No. 53305. Supreme Court of Florida. January 17, 1980. Rehearing Denied March 24, 1980. *413 Ronald R. Richmond, Chairman, Standing Committee on Unauthorized Practice of Law, New Port Richey, John A. Weiss and H. Glenn Boggs, Asst. Staff Counsels, and Cass D. Vickers, Bar Counsel, Tallahassee, for complainant. Albert J. Hadeed, Southern Legal Counsel, Inc., Gainesville, for respondent. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., J. Ke..

62719 Askew v. Firestone (1982)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 21, 1982

421 So. 2d 151 (1982) Reubin ASKEW, et al., Appellants, v. George FIRESTONE, As Secretary of State, Appellee. No. 62719. Supreme Court of Florida. October 21, 1982. *152 Albert J. Hadeed, John K. McPherson, and Terri Wood of Southern Legal Counsel, Inc., Gainesville, for appellants. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Eric J. Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee. McDONALD, Justice. Reubin Askew, Common Cause, and the League of Women Voters of Florida, Inc., appeal a trial court order valida..

54851 Plante v. Smathers (1979)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 21, 1979 Citations: 372 So. 2d 933

372 So. 2d 933 (1979) Kenneth A. PLANTE, Appellant, v. Bruce A. SMATHERS, Etc., et al., Appellees. No. 54851. Supreme Court of Florida. June 21, 1979. *935 Tobias Simon, Miami, Charles L. Carlton, Lakeland, and Richard C. McFarlain of McFarlain, Bobo & Sternstein, Tallahassee, for appellant. Albert J. Hadeed, Southern Legal Counsel, Inc., Gainesville, and Robert J. Vossler, Gen. Counsel, Dept. of State, Tallahassee, for appellees. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and David K. Miller, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tall..

10-009137DRI GINN-LA MARINA, LLLP, LTD, NORTHSHORE HAMMOCK LTD, LLLP, AND NORTHSHORE OCEAN HAMMOCK INVESTMENT, LTD, LLLP vs FLAGLER COUNTY (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 21, 2010

The issues are: (1) what are the correct procedures and substantive criteria to be applied in reviewing Petitioners' proposed "local" changes to the Hammock Dunes Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order (DO); (2) does Petitioners' application satisfy the applicable criteria for approval; and (3) do Petitioners or Respondent, Flagler County (County), have the legal ability or obligation through the Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) to the DO to change certain obligations of Intervenor, Admiral Corporation (Admiral), contained in the DO and in separate agreements related to the performance of certain DO obligations.NOPC partially denied because revisions not consistent with comprehensive plan and LDRs and applicants had no vested right to develop land dedicated to golf course usage.