welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Albert T. Gimbel
Albert T. Gimbel
Albert T. Gimbel
Visitors: 78
0
Bar #279730(FL)     License for 46 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Albert T. Gimbel? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 102.141, 106.011, 106.021, 106.023, 106.07, 106.12, 106.143, 106.23, 106.25, 106.265, 112.312, 112.313, 112.3145, 112.3148, 112.317, 112.320, 112.322, 112.324, 112.3241, 120.52, 120.569, 120.57, 120.68, 17.10, 20.23, 22.20, 287.012, 287.057, 334.044, 338.2216, 348.0003, 7.15, 943.0312

Florida Administrative Code: 28-106.101, 34-5.0015, 34-5.006

08-001567EC  IN RE: JOSEPH RUSSO vs *  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 27, 2008
Whether Respondent, when he voted April 18, 2002, as a member of the Palm Beach Gardens City Commission, on Resolution 54, 2002 and Resolution 57, 2002, relating to Parcel 6 and Parcel 24, respectively, of the Mirasol development project, knew that these measures would inure to the special private gain or loss of a principal by whom he was retained and thereby violated Section 112. 3143(3), Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Order Finding Probable Cause, and, if so, what is the appropriate penalty.City Council member did not violate voting conflicts law when he voted on measures that affected property of which he was aware his clients were discussing the possible purchase.
04-002867FE  GREG BROWN vs HILTON KELLY  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 16, 2004
06-004217BID  TEXAS AQUATIC HARVESTING, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 01, 2006
The issue is whether the Department of Environmental Protection's (the Department) intended award of a contract based on RFP 2006011C to A & L Weed Control (A&L), is contrary to the agency's governing statutes, rules, or policies, or the bid or proposal specifications, or was otherwise unlawful.Respondent`s decision to award a contract to intervenor was not contrary to its governing statutes, rules, or policies or the proposal specifications.
92-004332RP  GREAT NORTHERN INSURED ANNUITY CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND TREASURER  (1992)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 16, 1992
The basic issue for determination is whether proposed Rules 4-223.001 - .011, as promulgated June 26, 1992 and amended October 16, 1992, and thereafter, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.Definition of association as connected in mind or imagination is vague and unenforcable. Other rules are without statute basis and invalid.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer