Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida
Filed: Apr. 27, 2005
The issue is whether Petitioner has proved that the challenged provisions in a Request for Proposal for an 88-slot conditional-release program in Circuit 11 are clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.The provisions of the request for proposal that delegated calculation of the financial responsibility score to Dun and Bradstreet, using a secret formula, and failed to include enforceable performance standard in the contract, are contrary to competition.