Leon FL Litigation and Real estate Lawyers | Britt Lamar Tho -- eLawyers

94-006437 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs CHARLES R. THOMPSON (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 15, 1994

The issue in this case is whether Respondent, Charles R. Thompson, M.D., failed to practice medicine with that level of care, skill, and treatment which is recognized by a reasonably prudent similar physician as being acceptable under similar conditions and circumstances as alleged in an Administrative Complaint entered November 3, 1993.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent violated Section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes.

95-001834 BOARD OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE vs EDWIN T. GETTINS (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 14, 1995

The issue for consideration in this hearing is whether Respondent's license to practice osteopathic medicine in Florida should be disciplined because of the matters alleged in the Administrative Complaint filed herein.Doctor who prescribes and changes medicines for patient without seeing him and whose records do not support treatment rendered is subject to discipline - second offense.

94-001866 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ALFRED OCTAVIUS BONATI, M.D. (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 08, 1994

The issue for consideration in this matter is whether Respondent's license as a physician in Florida should be disciplined because of the matters alleged in the Administrative Complaints filed herein.Evidence shows only minor records deviation from standard, not experimental practice below standards or exploitation of patients for personl gain.

94-003531 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs BOYD ANSON SKINNER (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 28, 1994

The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether the Respondent's medical licensure should be subjected to discipline for the reasons asserted in the Administrative Complaint, involving his alleged malpractice concerning patient, E.L.Evid showed that R should have done add'l biospsy when patient re-presented w/recurrend sympts. He should have noted positive tumor margin w/1st biopsy

94-005118 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs CARLOS A. SOLORZANO (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 16, 1994

The issues in this case are framed by the parties' Joint Pre-Hearing Stipulation. Essentially, they are whether, in connection with his care and treatment of two patients, R.B., and D.T., the Respondent, who is an opthalmologist, violated Section 458.331(1)(t) and (m), Fla. Stat. (1993), by: gross or repeated malpractice, or the failure to practice medicine with that level of care, skill, and treatment which is recognized by a reasonably prudent similar physician as being acceptable under similar conditions and circumstances; or (m) failure to keep written medical records justifying the course of treatment of the patients.Petitioner did not prove opthalmologist practiced below standard of care doing iridotomies, lensectomy, vitrectomy, cryopexies. Some inadequate records

94-002942 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs MARY-CLAIRE CHAPMAN (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 26, 1994

In an administrative complaint dated December 20, 1993, Petitioner alleges that Respondent violated section 458.331(1)(t), F.S. with regard to the treatment of two inmate patients at Charlotte Correctional Institution, where Respondent was chief health officer. The issues for disposition in this proceeding are whether the violations occurred and, if so, what discipline is appropriate.Chief health officer in a prison violation standards of medical practice by not providing sufficient supervision and failing to obtain proper outside consultations.

94-001872 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs BARBARA ANNE MAZZELLA (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 07, 1994

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint? If so, what disciplinary action should be taken against her?Internist who missed pelvic fractures on hard to read x-ray, but who referred matter to radiologist and orthopedist did not breach standard of care.

93-003804 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs EDWARD NEIL FELDMAN (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 02, 1993

Whether Respondent violated a rule of the Board of Medicine or the Department by advertising in a deceptive or misleading manner, thereby violating a provision of Chapter 458, Florida Statutes, which makes a licensee subject to disciplinary action if found guilty of violating a rule of the Board or Department.Including in letterhead that he is diplomate in organization not recognized as specialty by board constitutes false advertising under rule.

01-003892PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ALFRED OCTAVIUS BONATI, M.D. (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 05, 2001

Britt Lamar Thomas