welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Brittany Adams Long
Brittany Adams Long
Brittany Adams Long
Visitors: 72
0
Bar #504556(FL)     License for 24 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Brittany Adams Long? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

CFR: 23 CFR 771.109, 23 CFR 771.1113, 23 CFR 771.125, 42 CFR 440.230, 42 CFR 440.230, 42 CFR 440.230

Florida Laws: 1001.30, 1002.31, 1002.33, 1003.03, 120.52, 120.536, 120.54, 120.541, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.60, 120.68, 20.315, 252.35, 287.001, 287.012, 287.056, 287.057, 334.30, 337.11, 376.40, 381.00315, 393.063, 393.066, 393.0661, 393.0662, 397.301, 397.305, 397.321, 397.419, 397.427, 409.902, 409.906, 409.913, 409.9131, 420.504, 420.507, 420.5099, 550.002, 550.054, 550.0745, 550.26165, 550.2625, 550.505, 550.6308, 57.111, 601.95, 607.1501, 7.20

Florida Administrative Code: 28-106.217, 59G-9.070

20-004322  LIFESTREAM BEHAVIORAL CENTER, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 29, 2020
The issue is whether the Department’s intended award allowing Metro to proceed to licensure for a methadone Medication-Assisted Treatment (“MAT”) facility in Lake County violated Florida Administrative Code Rule 65D- 30.0141, was arbitrary or capricious, or was otherwise unlawful as alleged in LifeStream’s Petition for Administrative Hearing (“Petition”).Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the Department's action in correcting scores on a competitive application for methadone MAT services was arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.
21-000727BID  VISTA AT COCONUT PALM, LTD vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 23, 2021
Whether Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (“Florida Housing”) preliminary award of funding to University Station I, LLC (“University Station”), was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious, or contrary to Florida Housing’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or RFA specifications.Petitioner failed to carry its burden of demonstrating that Florida Housing's proposed award to University Station was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer