Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
C Suzanne Bechard
C Suzanne Bechard
Visitors: 63
1
Bar #147745(FL)     License for 26 years
Tampa FL

Are you C Suzanne Bechard? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

  Deiterle v. State  (1931)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Apr. 03, 1931 Citations: 101 Fla. 79, 134 So. 42
The plaintiff in error was convicted of murder in the second degree in the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida. On writ of error sued out from the judgment of the Circuit Court to this Court, in an opinion rendered October 22nd, A.D. 1929 (Dieterle vs. State, 98 Fla. 739 ; 124 So. 47 ) the judgment of the trial court was reversed. On February 20th A.D. 1930 an information was filed against the plaintiff in error in the Criminal Court of Record in Dade County, charging him with the crime of murd..
  Deiterle v. State  (1931)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Apr. 03, 1931 Citations: 101 Fla. 79, 134 So. 42
The plaintiff in error was convicted of murder in the second degree in the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida. On writ of error sued out from the judgment of the Circuit Court to this Court, in an opinion rendered October 22nd, A.D. 1929 (Dieterle vs. State, 98 Fla. 739 ; 124 So. 47 ) the judgment of the trial court was reversed. On February 20th A.D. 1930 an information was filed against the plaintiff in error in the Criminal Court of Record in Dade County, charging him with the crime of murd..
  State v. Sullivan  (1948)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Feb. 03, 1948 Citations: 160 Fla. 115, 33 So. 2d 735
This cause comes on before this Court upon the Return to a Writ of Habeas Corpus issued upon a Petition therefor reciting that petitioner had been illegally committed by the Chancellor for contempt because on the non-payment of alimony, in that: "(a) The term of arrest or incarceration, as specified in said order, is vague, indefinite and uncertain in that it contains a provision that the relator, Robert James Carroll, be held by the respondent and imprisoned for a period of 'thirty days, or unti..
  State v. Sullivan  (1948)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Feb. 03, 1948 Citations: 160 Fla. 115, 33 So. 2d 735
This cause comes on before this Court upon the Return to a Writ of Habeas Corpus issued upon a Petition therefor reciting that petitioner had been illegally committed by the Chancellor for contempt because on the non-payment of alimony, in that: "(a) The term of arrest or incarceration, as specified in said order, is vague, indefinite and uncertain in that it contains a provision that the relator, Robert James Carroll, be held by the respondent and imprisoned for a period of 'thirty days, or unti..
  State v. Sullivan  (1948)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Feb. 03, 1948 Citations: 160 Fla. 115, 33 So. 2d 735
This cause comes on before this Court upon the Return to a Writ of Habeas Corpus issued upon a Petition therefor reciting that petitioner had been illegally committed by the Chancellor for contempt because on the non-payment of alimony, in that: "(a) The term of arrest or incarceration, as specified in said order, is vague, indefinite and uncertain in that it contains a provision that the relator, Robert James Carroll, be held by the respondent and imprisoned for a period of 'thirty days, or unti..
  Elder v. American Railway Express Co.  (1931)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jul. 05, 1931 Citations: 103 Fla. 1256, 140 So. 467
Writ of error dismissed on motion of counsel for Plaintiff in Error.
  Howe v. McDonald  (1941)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jul. 18, 1941 Citations: 147 Fla. 745, 3 So. 2d 724
This is our second consideration of this case. Howe v. MacDonald, et al., 141 Fla. 822 , 194 So. 802 . It is a companion case to Howe v. Samuel Sands, et al., decided this date, there being no difference in the factual background of the two cases except in this case the bill of complaint was filed by appellees praying that they be declared to be "servants" of James Deering, entitled to inherit under his will. In all other respects, the facts and the questions raised are identical. The judgment ap..
  Aultman v. the Seaboard Oil Co.  (1937)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jul. 31, 1937 Citations: 129 Fla. 1, 175 So. 901
The writ of error is to review a judgment in favor of defendant on demurrer sustained to amended declaration. The amended declaration was in one count containing paragraphs designated (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), *Page 2 (f), (g), (h), (i), and (j). We think it expedient to quote the entire declaration which was in the following language: "S.B. Aultman, plaintiff, sues The Seaboard Oil Company, a Florida corporation, defendant, by this his amended declaration, for that: "COUNT No. 1. "(a) On, to-wit:..
  The Tampa Gas Company v. Sparkman  (1943)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 15, 1943 Citations: 14 So. 2d 196, 153 Fla. 177
Section 34, Chapter 20723, Acts 1941, provides: "Any person who fails to make a tax return as required *Page 178 by this Act shall pay as a penalty, in addition to and as part of the tax a sum equal to 10% of the tax found to be due. . ." On petition for certiorari under Rule 34 we review an order of the lower court upholding the statute. The question is whether the quoted part of the statute is in contravention of Sec. 1 of Art. IX, Constitution of Florida, Sec. 12, Declaration of Rights, Consti..
  Holland v. Roberts  (1942)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jan. 16, 1942 Citations: 149 Fla. 308, 5 So. 2d 608
We are petitioned to review on certiorari under our Rule 34 an order denying motion to dismiss and granting temporary restraining order, as follows: "It Is Further Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that pending further order of this Court the defendants and each of them and their agents, servants and employees be and they are hereby enjoined and restrained from enforcing the provisions of Section 2 of Chapter 10123 of the Laws of Florida, 1925, being Section 1861, Compiled General Laws of Florida, 19..

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer