Duval FL Civil rights, Litigation and Oil and gas Lawyers

Cindy A Laquidara

Visitors: 108

Bar #394246(FL) License for 41 years; Member in Good Standing

Jacksonville FL

Are you Cindy A Laquidara? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Florida Administrative Code: 34-5.0015, 40C-2.101, 40C-2.301

17-004509BID BOSTON CULINARY GROUP, INC., D/B/A CENTERPLATE vs UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2017

The issue in this de novo proceeding is whether the intended action of Respondent, University of Central Florida (University), to award a concessions and food services management contract to Ovation Food Services, L.P., d/b/a Spectra Food Services and Hospitality (Spectra), is contrary to the statutes, regulations, or policies governing the University, or contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious. The standard of proof for this proceeding is whether the proposed contract award is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious. Petitioner, Boston Culinary Group, Inc., d/b/a Centerplate (Centerplate) bears the burden of proof.Vendor sucessfully challenging ITN award proved University participation in proceeding was for an improper purpose. Fees and costs awarded.

Bankruptcy No. 98-0492-3P7. Adversary No. 98-93 In Re Henrie (1999)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Jun. 22, 1999 Citations: 235 B.R. 113

235 B.R. 113 (1999) In re Chris R. HENRIE, Debtor. Patricia F. Burgess f/k/a/ Patricia Henrie, Plaintiff, v. Chris R. Henrie, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 98-0492-3P7. Adversary No. 98-93. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. June 22, 1999. *114 *115 Denise E. Barnett, Jax, FL, for plaintiff. Robert Altman, Palatka, FL, for defendant. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW GEORGE L. PROCTOR, Bankruptcy Judge. This proceeding came before the Court upon a complaint fil..

2D07-5591 Koester v. State (2008)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 12, 2008 Citations: 997 So. 2d 415

997 So. 2d 415 (2008) KOESTER v. STATE. No. 2D07-5591. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. December 12, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

3D01-1008 University of Miami v. MA (2001)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jun. 13, 2001 Citations: 793 So. 2d 999

793 So. 2d 999 (2001) UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. M.A., a minor, etc., et al., Respondents. No. 3D01-1008. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. June 13, 2001. Rehearing and Certification Denied September 19, 2001. Fowler White Burnett and Steven E. Stark, Miami, for petitioners. Rossman, Baumberger & Reboso and Lincoln J. Connolly, Miami, for respondents. Before JORGENSON, GODERICH, and FLETCHER, JJ. Rehearing En Banc and Certification Denied September 19, 2..

QQ-431 Festa v. Teleflex, Inc. (1980)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Apr. 02, 1980 Citations: 382 So. 2d 122

382 So. 2d 122 (1980) Michael R. FESTA, Appellant, v. TELEFLEX, INC. and Reliance Insurance Company, Appellees. No. QQ-431. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. April 2, 1980. Rehearing Denied May 28, 1980. Jim D. Syprett, of Crabtree, Butler, Syprett & Meshad, Sarasota, for appellant. Richard R. Crooke, of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for appellees. PER CURIAM. Festa seeks review of an order from the judge of industrial claims finding that he did not suffer an oc..

89-2578 Garrahan v. Sea Ray Boats, Inc. (1990)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 31, 1990 Citations: 569 So. 2d 518

569 So. 2d 518 (1990) Joseph GARRAHAN, Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. SEA RAY BOATS, INC., Appellee/Cross Appellant. No. 89-2578. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. October 31, 1990. Rehearing Denied December 4, 1990. Thomas E. Kingcade of Thomas E. Kingcade, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant/cross appellee. Ronald Fitzgerald and Anuraag H. Singhal of Fleming, O'Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee/cross appellant. PER CURIAM. A directed verdict for the defendant at ..

SC07-2235 Jackson-Shaw Co. v. AVIATION AUTHORITY (2008)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Dec. 18, 2008 Citations: 8 So. 3d 1076

8 So. 3d 1076 (2008) JACKSON-SHAW COMPANY, etc., Appellant, v. JACKSONVILLE AVIATION AUTHORITY, etc., Appellee. No. SC07-2235. Supreme Court of Florida. December 18, 2008. *1078 John S. Mills and Bryan S. Gowdy of Mills, Creed and Gowdy, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, Michael G. Tanner and Stuart F. Williams of Tanner Bishop, Jacksonville, FL, for Appellant. Cindy A. Laquidara, Chief Deputy General Counsel, City of Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. This case is before the Court f..

3D06-2396 McCloskey Const. Corp. v. Toco Homes, Inc. (2007)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 18, 2007 Citations: 962 So. 2d 357

962 So. 2d 357 (2007) McCLOSKEY CONSTRUCTION CORP., Appellant, v. TOCO HOMES, INC., Equitymax, Inc., Tony B. Brown and Lenise D. Brown, and Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp., Appellees. No. 3D06-2396. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. July 18, 2007. Deborah Marks, Miami, for appellant. *358 Smoler Lerman Bente Whitebook and Carlos D. Lerman, Hollywood, for appellees. Before RAMIREZ, CORTIÑAS, and ROTHENBERG, JJ. CORTIÑAS, Judge. The Plaintiff, McCloskey Construction Corp. ("McClos..

09-000388EC IN RE: BRENDA PRIESTLY-JACKSON vs * (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 23, 2009

The issue is whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes (2007), by using her position as a member of the Duval County School Board to influence placement of her children in magnet schools without following proper procedures, and if so, what is an appropriate penalty.Advocate did not prove a violation of the Ethics Code.

20-002660BID GATEWAY RETAIL CENTER vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES (2020)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 11, 2020

Whether the Department of Children and Families’ (“the Department”) intent to award the contract associated with Invitation to Negotiate No. 590:3161 (“the ITN”) to Midtown Centre Office, LLC (“Midtown”) was arbitrary or capricious, irrational, or otherwise contrary to the law.1Gateway has not carried its burden of demonstrating that the Department's intended award to Midtown is arbitrary or capricious.